docs: fix doctests and run them in CI workflow.
This commit is contained in:
parent
5d872096a7
commit
342fd5f8bd
3 changed files with 14 additions and 8 deletions
|
|
@ -800,7 +800,7 @@ Every signal included in the target of an assignment becomes a part of the domai
|
|||
|
||||
Clearly, Amaranth code that drives a single bit of a signal from two different domains does not describe a meaningful circuit. However, driving two different bits of a signal from two different domains does not inherently cause such a conflict. Would Amaranth accept the following code?
|
||||
|
||||
.. testcode::
|
||||
.. code-block::
|
||||
|
||||
e = Signal(2)
|
||||
m.d.comb += e[0].eq(0)
|
||||
|
|
@ -945,6 +945,7 @@ Signals in the combinatorial :ref:`control domain <lang-domains>` change wheneve
|
|||
Consider the following code:
|
||||
|
||||
.. testsetup::
|
||||
|
||||
en = Signal()
|
||||
b = Signal(8)
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
|
|||
sphinx~=6.1
|
||||
sphinx~=5.3
|
||||
sphinxcontrib-platformpicker~=1.3
|
||||
sphinx-rtd-theme~=1.2
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue