hdl.ir: flatten hierarchy based on memory accesses, too.
This commit is contained in:
parent
fd89d2fc9d
commit
68dae9f50e
|
@ -105,51 +105,81 @@ class Fragment:
|
|||
break
|
||||
assert found
|
||||
|
||||
def _resolve_driver_conflicts(self, hierarchy=("top",), mode="warn"):
|
||||
def _resolve_hierarchy_conflicts(self, hierarchy=("top",), mode="warn"):
|
||||
assert mode in ("silent", "warn", "error")
|
||||
|
||||
driver_subfrags = SignalDict()
|
||||
memory_subfrags = OrderedDict()
|
||||
def add_subfrag(registry, entity, entry):
|
||||
if entity not in registry:
|
||||
registry[entity] = set()
|
||||
registry[entity].add(entry)
|
||||
|
||||
# For each signal driven by this fragment and/or its subfragments, determine which
|
||||
# subfragments also drive it.
|
||||
for domain, signal in self.iter_drivers():
|
||||
if signal not in driver_subfrags:
|
||||
driver_subfrags[signal] = set()
|
||||
driver_subfrags[signal].add((None, hierarchy))
|
||||
add_subfrag(driver_subfrags, signal, (None, hierarchy))
|
||||
|
||||
for i, (subfrag, name) in enumerate(self.subfragments):
|
||||
# Never flatten instances.
|
||||
if isinstance(subfrag, Instance):
|
||||
# For memories (which are subfragments, but semantically a part of superfragment),
|
||||
# record that this fragment is driving it.
|
||||
if subfrag.type in ("$memrd", "$memwr"):
|
||||
memory = subfrag.parameters["MEMID"]
|
||||
add_subfrag(memory_subfrags, memory, (None, hierarchy))
|
||||
|
||||
# Never flatten instances.
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
# First, recurse into subfragments and let them detect driver conflicts as well.
|
||||
if name is None:
|
||||
name = "<unnamed #{}>".format(i)
|
||||
subfrag_hierarchy = hierarchy + (name,)
|
||||
subfrag_drivers = subfrag._resolve_driver_conflicts(subfrag_hierarchy, mode)
|
||||
subfrag_drivers, subfrag_memories = \
|
||||
subfrag._resolve_hierarchy_conflicts(subfrag_hierarchy, mode)
|
||||
|
||||
# Second, classify subfragments by domains they define.
|
||||
# Second, classify subfragments by signals they drive and memories they use.
|
||||
for signal in subfrag_drivers:
|
||||
if signal not in driver_subfrags:
|
||||
driver_subfrags[signal] = set()
|
||||
driver_subfrags[signal].add((subfrag, subfrag_hierarchy))
|
||||
add_subfrag(driver_subfrags, signal, (subfrag, subfrag_hierarchy))
|
||||
for memory in subfrag_memories:
|
||||
add_subfrag(memory_subfrags, memory, (subfrag, subfrag_hierarchy))
|
||||
|
||||
# Find out the set of subfragments that needs to be flattened into this fragment
|
||||
# to resolve driver-driver conflicts.
|
||||
flatten_subfrags = set()
|
||||
for signal, subfrags in driver_subfrags.items():
|
||||
if len(subfrags) > 1:
|
||||
flatten_subfrags.update((f, h) for f, h in subfrags if f is not None)
|
||||
def flatten_subfrags_if_needed(subfrags):
|
||||
if len(subfrags) == 1:
|
||||
return []
|
||||
flatten_subfrags.update((f, h) for f, h in subfrags if f is not None)
|
||||
return list(sorted(".".join(h) for f, h in subfrags))
|
||||
|
||||
# While we're at it, show a message.
|
||||
subfrag_names = ", ".join(sorted(".".join(h) for f, h in subfrags))
|
||||
message = ("Signal '{}' is driven from multiple fragments: {}"
|
||||
.format(signal, subfrag_names))
|
||||
if mode == "error":
|
||||
raise DriverConflict(message)
|
||||
elif mode == "warn":
|
||||
message += "; hierarchy will be flattened"
|
||||
warnings.warn_explicit(message, DriverConflict, *signal.src_loc)
|
||||
for signal, subfrags in driver_subfrags.items():
|
||||
subfrag_names = flatten_subfrags_if_needed(subfrags)
|
||||
if not subfrag_names:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
# While we're at it, show a message.
|
||||
message = ("Signal '{}' is driven from multiple fragments: {}"
|
||||
.format(signal, ", ".join(subfrag_names)))
|
||||
if mode == "error":
|
||||
raise DriverConflict(message)
|
||||
elif mode == "warn":
|
||||
message += "; hierarchy will be flattened"
|
||||
warnings.warn_explicit(message, DriverConflict, *signal.src_loc)
|
||||
|
||||
for memory, subfrags in memory_subfrags.items():
|
||||
subfrag_names = flatten_subfrags_if_needed(subfrags)
|
||||
if not subfrag_names:
|
||||
continue
|
||||
|
||||
# While we're at it, show a message.
|
||||
message = ("Memory '{}' is accessed from multiple fragments: {}"
|
||||
.format(memory.name, ", ".join(subfrag_names)))
|
||||
if mode == "error":
|
||||
raise DriverConflict(message)
|
||||
elif mode == "warn":
|
||||
message += "; hierarchy will be flattened"
|
||||
warnings.warn_explicit(message, DriverConflict, *memory.src_loc)
|
||||
|
||||
# Flatten hierarchy.
|
||||
for subfrag, subfrag_hierarchy in sorted(flatten_subfrags, key=lambda x: x[1]):
|
||||
|
@ -163,10 +193,11 @@ class Fragment:
|
|||
# has another conflict.
|
||||
if any(flatten_subfrags):
|
||||
# Try flattening again.
|
||||
return self._resolve_driver_conflicts(hierarchy, mode)
|
||||
return self._resolve_hierarchy_conflicts(hierarchy, mode)
|
||||
|
||||
# Nothing was flattened, we're done!
|
||||
return SignalSet(driver_subfrags.keys())
|
||||
return (SignalSet(driver_subfrags.keys()),
|
||||
set(memory_subfrags.keys()))
|
||||
|
||||
def _propagate_domains_up(self, hierarchy=("top",)):
|
||||
from .xfrm import DomainRenamer
|
||||
|
@ -309,7 +340,7 @@ class Fragment:
|
|||
|
||||
fragment = FragmentTransformer()(self)
|
||||
fragment._propagate_domains(ensure_sync_exists)
|
||||
fragment._resolve_driver_conflicts()
|
||||
fragment._resolve_hierarchy_conflicts()
|
||||
fragment = fragment._insert_domain_resets()
|
||||
fragment = fragment._lower_domain_signals()
|
||||
fragment._propagate_ports(ports)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ from collections import OrderedDict
|
|||
from ..hdl.ast import *
|
||||
from ..hdl.cd import *
|
||||
from ..hdl.ir import *
|
||||
from ..hdl.mem import *
|
||||
from .tools import *
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -321,7 +322,7 @@ class FragmentDomainsTestCase(FHDLTestCase):
|
|||
self.assertEqual(f1.domains["sync"], f2.domains["sync"])
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class FragmentDriverConflictTestCase(FHDLTestCase):
|
||||
class FragmentHierarchyConflictTestCase(FHDLTestCase):
|
||||
def setUp_self_sub(self):
|
||||
self.s1 = Signal()
|
||||
self.c1 = Signal()
|
||||
|
@ -350,7 +351,7 @@ class FragmentDriverConflictTestCase(FHDLTestCase):
|
|||
def test_conflict_self_sub(self):
|
||||
self.setUp_self_sub()
|
||||
|
||||
self.f1._resolve_driver_conflicts(mode="silent")
|
||||
self.f1._resolve_hierarchy_conflicts(mode="silent")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.f1.subfragments, [
|
||||
(self.f1a, "f1a"),
|
||||
(self.f1b, "f1b"),
|
||||
|
@ -372,7 +373,7 @@ class FragmentDriverConflictTestCase(FHDLTestCase):
|
|||
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(DriverConflict,
|
||||
msg="Signal '(sig s1)' is driven from multiple fragments: top, top.<unnamed #1>"):
|
||||
self.f1._resolve_driver_conflicts(mode="error")
|
||||
self.f1._resolve_hierarchy_conflicts(mode="error")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_conflict_self_sub_warning(self):
|
||||
self.setUp_self_sub()
|
||||
|
@ -380,7 +381,7 @@ class FragmentDriverConflictTestCase(FHDLTestCase):
|
|||
with self.assertWarns(DriverConflict,
|
||||
msg="Signal '(sig s1)' is driven from multiple fragments: top, top.<unnamed #1>; "
|
||||
"hierarchy will be flattened"):
|
||||
self.f1._resolve_driver_conflicts(mode="warn")
|
||||
self.f1._resolve_hierarchy_conflicts(mode="warn")
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp_sub_sub(self):
|
||||
self.s1 = Signal()
|
||||
|
@ -402,7 +403,7 @@ class FragmentDriverConflictTestCase(FHDLTestCase):
|
|||
def test_conflict_sub_sub(self):
|
||||
self.setUp_sub_sub()
|
||||
|
||||
self.f1._resolve_driver_conflicts(mode="silent")
|
||||
self.f1._resolve_hierarchy_conflicts(mode="silent")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.f1.subfragments, [])
|
||||
self.assertRepr(self.f1.statements, """
|
||||
(
|
||||
|
@ -431,7 +432,7 @@ class FragmentDriverConflictTestCase(FHDLTestCase):
|
|||
def test_conflict_self_subsub(self):
|
||||
self.setUp_self_subsub()
|
||||
|
||||
self.f1._resolve_driver_conflicts(mode="silent")
|
||||
self.f1._resolve_hierarchy_conflicts(mode="silent")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.f1.subfragments, [])
|
||||
self.assertRepr(self.f1.statements, """
|
||||
(
|
||||
|
@ -440,6 +441,43 @@ class FragmentDriverConflictTestCase(FHDLTestCase):
|
|||
)
|
||||
""")
|
||||
|
||||
def setUp_memory(self):
|
||||
self.m = Memory(width=8, depth=4)
|
||||
self.fr = self.m.read_port().get_fragment(platform=None)
|
||||
self.fw = self.m.write_port().get_fragment(platform=None)
|
||||
self.f1 = Fragment()
|
||||
self.f2 = Fragment()
|
||||
self.f2.add_subfragment(self.fr)
|
||||
self.f1.add_subfragment(self.f2)
|
||||
self.f3 = Fragment()
|
||||
self.f3.add_subfragment(self.fw)
|
||||
self.f1.add_subfragment(self.f3)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_conflict_memory(self):
|
||||
self.setUp_memory()
|
||||
|
||||
self.f1._resolve_hierarchy_conflicts(mode="silent")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.f1.subfragments, [
|
||||
(self.fr, None),
|
||||
(self.fw, None),
|
||||
])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_conflict_memory_error(self):
|
||||
self.setUp_memory()
|
||||
|
||||
with self.assertRaises(DriverConflict,
|
||||
msg="Memory 'm' is accessed from multiple fragments: top.<unnamed #0>, "
|
||||
"top.<unnamed #1>"):
|
||||
self.f1._resolve_hierarchy_conflicts(mode="error")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_conflict_memory_warning(self):
|
||||
self.setUp_memory()
|
||||
|
||||
with self.assertWarns(DriverConflict,
|
||||
msg="Memory 'm' is accessed from multiple fragments: top.<unnamed #0>, "
|
||||
"top.<unnamed #1>; hierarchy will be flattened"):
|
||||
self.f1._resolve_hierarchy_conflicts(mode="warn")
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
class InstanceTestCase(FHDLTestCase):
|
||||
def setUp_cpu(self):
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue