The main purpose of this change is migrating glasgow from the compat
`TSTriple` (which allows 0 width) to `Pin`. This sort of change would
normally require a RFC, but `Pin` is already slated for
removal/replacement, so that was deemed to be unnecessary.
There's an actual `py_enum.member` (which we briefly overwrite our loop
index with (!)). We delete our `member`, but it's still in the
`__all__` that came from `py_enum`, so `import *` fails.
Amaranth bitwise negation `~` compiles to Python bitwise negation `~` in
simulation; the same holds for comparison operators such as `==`. Thus
an expression such as `~(a == b)` in simulation will compile to Python
that takes the bitwise negation of the comparison result, which will be
an actual bool.
On 3.12, the result is a `DeprecationWarning` emitted only at simulation
run-time.
When negating in simulation, coerce the value to an int. `mask` is
sufficient as we do no further arithmetic here.
The only breaking change in 0.4 is dropping support for Python 3.6,
which Amaranth has already dropped. It also adds official support for
3.10 and 3.11.
3ad7340072/CHANGELOG.rst
This fixes the following issues:
- on Python 3.10 and earlier, storing to free variables is now handled
correctly
- on Python 3.11, `_varname_from_oparg` is now used, fixing problems
with cell variables that are also arguments
- on all supported versions, EXTENDED_ARG is now parsed, ensuring proper
handling for long functions
Fixes#792.
This is actually an existing correctness requirement (for the similar
reasons that ValueCastable.as_value() must always return the same
value every time) that for some reason wasn't respected.
See amaranth-lang/rfcs#15 and #784.
Note that this RFC breaks the existing syntax for initializing a view
with a new signal. Instances of `View(layout)` *must* be changed to
`Signal(layout)`.
See amaranth-lang/rfcs#15 and #784.
Note that this RFC breaks the existing syntax for initializing a view
with a new signal. Instances of `View(layout)` *must* be changed to
`Signal(layout)`.
Found while working on amaranth/rfcs#15. The new code is also robust
in the face of RFC 15 itself (the value returned by Signal will change
but that will save work for the programmer).
