This can cause confusion:
* If the erroneous object is None, it is printed as 'None', which
appears as a string (and could be the result of converting None
to a string.)
* If the erroneous object is a string, it is printed as ''<val>'',
which is a rather strange combination of quotes.
The write port priority in Yosys is derived directly from the order
in which the ports are declared in the Verilog frontend. It is being
removed for several reasons:
1. It is not clear if it works correctly for all cases (FFRAM,
LUTRAM, BRAM).
2. Although it is roundtripped via Verilog with correct simulation
semantics, the resulting code has a high chance of being
interpreted incorrectly by Xilinx tools.
3. It cannot be roundtripped via FIRRTL, which is an alternative
backend that is an interesting future option. (FIRRTL leaves
write collision completely undefined.)
3. It is a niche feature that, if it is needed, can be completely
replaced using an explicit comparator, priority encoder, and
write enable gating circuit. (This is what Xilinx recommends
for handling this case.)
In the future we should extend nMigen's formal verification to assert
that a write collision does not happen.
Almost no code would specify Signal(_, name) as a positional argument
on purpose, but forgetting parens and accidentally placing signedness
into the name position is so common that we had a test for it.
This is necessary for consistency, since for transparent read ports,
we currently do not support .en at all (it is fixed at 1) due to
YosysHQ/yosys#760. Before this commit, changing port transparency
would require adding or removing an assignment to .en, which is
confusing and error-prone.
Also, most read ports are always enabled, so this behavior is also
convenient.
Also, replace `bits, sign = x.shape()` with more idiomatic
`width, signed = x.shape()`.
This unifies all properties corresponding to `len(x)` to `x.width`.
(Not all values have a `width` property.)
Fixes#210.
Platform.prepare() was completely broken after addition of local
clock domains, and only really worked before by a series of
accidents because there was a circular dependency between creation
of missing domains, fragment preparation, and insertion of pin
subfragments.
This commit untangles the dependency by adding a separate public
method Fragment.create_missing_domains(), used in build.plat.
It also makes DomainCollector consider both used and defined domains,
such that it will work on fragments before domain propagation, since
create_missing_domains() can be called by user code before prepare().
The fragment driving missing clock domain is not flattened anymore,
because flattening does not work well combined with local domains.
The elaboratable is already likely driving the clk/rst signals in
some way appropriate for the platform; if we expose them as ports
nevertheless it will cause problems downstream.
This pattern usually produces an extremely hard to notice bug that
will usually break a design when it is triggered, but will also be
hidden unless the pathological value of a boolean switch is used.
Fixes#159.